linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] perf: kretprobes: offset from reloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170304113825.bda12eb55495bfe8018638f7@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 4 Mar 2017 11:38:25 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] perf: kretprobes: offset from reloc_sym if
 kernel supports it

On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 11:35:51 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 09:49:11 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu,  2 Mar 2017 23:25:06 +0530
> > "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > We indicate support for accepting sym+offset with kretprobes through a
> > > line in ftrace README. Parse the same to identify support and choose the
> > > appropriate format for kprobe_events.
> > 
> > Could you give us an example of this change here? :)
> > for example, comment of commit 613f050d68a8 .
> > 
> > I think the code is OK, but we need actual example of result.
> 
> Hi Naveen,
> 
> I've tried following commands
> 
> $ grep "[Tt] user_read$" /proc/kallsyms  
> 0000000000000000 T user_read
> 0000000000000000 t user_read
> $ sudo ./perf probe -D user_read%return
> r:probe/user_read _text+3539616
> r:probe/user_read_1 _text+3653408
> 
> OK, looks good. However, when I set the retprobes, I got an error.
> 
> $ sudo ./perf probe -a user_read%return
> Failed to write event: Invalid argument
>   Error: Failed to add events.
> 
> And kernel rejected that.
> 
> $ dmesg -k | tail -n 1
> [  850.315068] Given offset is not valid for return probe.
> 
> Hmm, curious..
> 
> I tried normal probes
> 
> $ sudo ./perf probe -D user_read
> p:probe/user_read _text+3539616
> p:probe/user_read_1 _text+3653408
> $ sudo ./perf probe -a user_read
> Added new events:
>   probe:user_read      (on user_read)
>   probe:user_read_1    (on user_read)
> 
> You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
> 
> 	perf record -e probe:user_read_1 -aR sleep 1
> 
> It works!
> 
> $ sudo ./perf probe -l
>   probe:user_read      (on user_read@...urity/keys/user_defined.c)
>   probe:user_read_1    (on user_read@...inux/ss/policydb.c)
> $ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list
> ffffffff9237bf20  k  user_read+0x0    [DISABLED][FTRACE]
> ffffffff923602a0  k  user_read+0x0    [DISABLED][FTRACE]
> 
> So, the both "_text+3539616" and "_text+3653408" are correctly located
> on the entry address of user_read functions. It seems kernel-side
> symbol+offset check is wrong.

FYI, without this patch, perf probe returns same place for same-name
functions. So this patch itself looks good.

$ sudo ./perf probe -D user_read%return
r:probe/user_read user_read+0
r:probe/user_read_1 user_read+0


Thanks,


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>