[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1772276.4tCnP8C0XV@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 01:03:17 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: schedutil: remove redundant code from sugov_next_freq_shared()
On Thursday, March 02, 2017 02:03:22 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The same code is present both within and outside the loop and it doesn't
> look like it provides any additional benefit.
Well, not quite. This is on purpose.
Note the "if (j == smp_processor_id())" condition within the loop and think
about how the current CPU is taken into account. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists