[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeU0aNy0CHMpvOxuMcBw1qHf-1qjyfb_mt6g-m4XjB1WnYHHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 06:24:03 -0800
From: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock
Hi Tejun,
>> @@ -184,24 +185,48 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
>> + if (unlikely(!wb_congested)) {
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> goto err_put_css;
>> + } else if (unlikely(!blkg)) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err_put_congested;
>> }
>
> I'm not sure this error handling logic is correct. We can have any
> combo of alloc failure here, right?
I tried to simplify this part in v4, please take a look.
>> @@ -694,9 +695,20 @@ static inline bool blkcg_bio_issue_check(struct request_queue *q,
>> blkg = blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
>> if (unlikely(!blkg)) {
>> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> - blkg = blkg_lookup_create(blkcg, q);
>> - if (IS_ERR(blkg))
>> - blkg = NULL;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * This could be the first entry point of blkcg implementation
>> + * and we shouldn't allow anything to go through for a bypassing
>> + * queue.
>> + */
>> + if (likely(!blk_queue_bypass(q))) {
>> + blkg = blkg_lookup_create(blkcg, q,
>> + GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN,
>> + NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(blkg))
>> + blkg = NULL;
>> + }
>
> Heh, this seems a bit too fragile. I get that this covers both call
> paths into lookup_create which needs the checking, but it seems a bit
> too nasty to do it this way. Would it be ugly if we factor out both
> policy enabled and bypass tests into a helper and have inner
> __blkg_lookup_create() which skips it? We can call the same helper
> from blkg_create() when @pol. Sorry that this is involving so much
> bikeshedding.
I have added a __blkg_lookup_create() and moved queue bypass check to
blkg_lookup_create(). This probably doesn't cover all your points but
I hope it is going towards the right direction. Do you still think we
need a helper function for policy/queue bypass checks?
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com> wrote:
> blkg_conf_prep() currently calls blkg_lookup_create() while holding
> request queue spinlock. This means allocating memory for struct
> blkcg_gq has to be made non-blocking. This causes occasional -ENOMEM
> failures in call paths like below:
>
> pcpu_alloc+0x68f/0x710
> __alloc_percpu_gfp+0xd/0x10
> __percpu_counter_init+0x55/0xc0
> cfq_pd_alloc+0x3b2/0x4e0
> blkg_alloc+0x187/0x230
> blkg_create+0x489/0x670
> blkg_lookup_create+0x9a/0x230
> blkg_conf_prep+0x1fb/0x240
> __cfqg_set_weight_device.isra.105+0x5c/0x180
> cfq_set_weight_on_dfl+0x69/0xc0
> cgroup_file_write+0x39/0x1c0
> kernfs_fop_write+0x13f/0x1d0
> __vfs_write+0x23/0x120
> vfs_write+0xc2/0x1f0
> SyS_write+0x44/0xb0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
>
> In the code path above, percpu allocator cannot call vmalloc() due to
> queue spinlock.
>
> A failure in this call path gives grief to tools which are trying to
> configure io weights. We see occasional failures happen shortly after
> reboots even when system is not under any memory pressure. Machines
> with a lot of cpus are more vulnerable to this condition.
>
> Update blkg_create() function to temporarily drop the rcu and queue
> locks when it is allowed by gfp mask.
>
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
> ---
> v4:
> Simplified error checking in blkg_create()
> Factored out __blkg_lookup_create()
>
> v3:
> Pushed down all blkg allocations into blkg_create()
>
> v2:
> Moved blkg creation into blkg_lookup_create() to avoid duplicating
> blkg_lookup_create() logic.
>
> block/blk-cgroup.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 6 ++-
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> index 295e98c2c8cc..f7bc93928818 100644
> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> @@ -164,16 +164,17 @@ struct blkcg_gq *blkg_lookup_slowpath(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup_slowpath);
>
> /*
> - * If @new_blkg is %NULL, this function tries to allocate a new one as
> - * necessary using %GFP_NOWAIT. @new_blkg is always consumed on return.
> + * If gfp mask allows blocking, this function temporarily drops rcu and queue
> + * locks to allocate memory.
> */
> static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> - struct request_queue *q,
> - struct blkcg_gq *new_blkg)
> + struct request_queue *q, gfp_t gfp,
> + const struct blkcg_policy *pol)
> {
> - struct blkcg_gq *blkg;
> + struct blkcg_gq *blkg = NULL;
> struct bdi_writeback_congested *wb_congested;
> int i, ret;
> + const bool drop_locks = gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp);
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> lockdep_assert_held(q->queue_lock);
> @@ -184,31 +185,52 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> goto err_free_blkg;
> }
>
> + if (drop_locks) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +
> wb_congested = wb_congested_get_create(q->backing_dev_info,
> - blkcg->css.id,
> - GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
> - if (!wb_congested) {
> + blkcg->css.id, gfp);
> + blkg = blkg_alloc(blkcg, q, gfp);
> +
> + if (drop_locks) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(!wb_congested || !blkg)) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto err_put_css;
> + goto err_put;
> }
>
> - /* allocate */
> - if (!new_blkg) {
> - new_blkg = blkg_alloc(blkcg, q, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
> - if (unlikely(!new_blkg)) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto err_put_congested;
> + blkg->wb_congested = wb_congested;
> +
> + if (pol) {
> + WARN_ON(!drop_locks);
> +
> + if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) {
> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto err_put;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * This could be the first entry point of blkcg implementation
> + * and we shouldn't allow anything to go through for a bypassing
> + * queue.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q))) {
> + ret = blk_queue_dying(q) ? -ENODEV : -EBUSY;
> + goto err_put;
> }
> }
> - blkg = new_blkg;
> - blkg->wb_congested = wb_congested;
>
> /* link parent */
> if (blkcg_parent(blkcg)) {
> blkg->parent = __blkg_lookup(blkcg_parent(blkcg), q, false);
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!blkg->parent)) {
> ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_put_congested;
> + goto err_put;
> }
> blkg_get(blkg->parent);
> }
> @@ -245,44 +267,43 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> blkg_put(blkg);
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> -err_put_congested:
> - wb_congested_put(wb_congested);
> -err_put_css:
> +err_put:
> + if (wb_congested)
> + wb_congested_put(wb_congested);
> css_put(&blkcg->css);
> err_free_blkg:
> - blkg_free(new_blkg);
> + blkg_free(blkg);
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
>
> /**
> - * blkg_lookup_create - lookup blkg, try to create one if not there
> + * __blkg_lookup_create - lookup blkg, try to create one if not there
> * @blkcg: blkcg of interest
> * @q: request_queue of interest
> + * @gfp: gfp mask
> + * @pol: blkcg policy (optional)
> *
> * Lookup blkg for the @blkcg - @q pair. If it doesn't exist, try to
> * create one. blkg creation is performed recursively from blkcg_root such
> * that all non-root blkg's have access to the parent blkg. This function
> * should be called under RCU read lock and @q->queue_lock.
> *
> + * When gfp mask allows blocking, rcu and queue locks may be dropped for
> + * allocating memory. In this case, the locks will be reacquired on return.
> + *
> * Returns pointer to the looked up or created blkg on success, ERR_PTR()
> * value on error. If @q is dead, returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL). If @q is not
> * dead and bypassing, returns ERR_PTR(-EBUSY).
> */
> -struct blkcg_gq *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> - struct request_queue *q)
> +struct blkcg_gq *__blkg_lookup_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> + struct request_queue *q, gfp_t gfp,
> + const struct blkcg_policy *pol)
> {
> struct blkcg_gq *blkg;
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> lockdep_assert_held(q->queue_lock);
>
> - /*
> - * This could be the first entry point of blkcg implementation and
> - * we shouldn't allow anything to go through for a bypassing queue.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q)))
> - return ERR_PTR(blk_queue_dying(q) ? -ENODEV : -EBUSY);
> -
> blkg = __blkg_lookup(blkcg, q, true);
> if (blkg)
> return blkg;
> @@ -300,12 +321,35 @@ struct blkcg_gq *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> parent = blkcg_parent(parent);
> }
>
> - blkg = blkg_create(pos, q, NULL);
> + blkg = blkg_create(pos, q, gfp, pol);
> if (pos == blkcg || IS_ERR(blkg))
> return blkg;
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * blkg_lookup_create - lookup blkg, try to create one if not there
> + *
> + * Performs an initial queue bypass check and then passes control to
> + * __blkg_lookup_create().
> + */
> +struct blkcg_gq *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> + struct request_queue *q, gfp_t gfp,
> + const struct blkcg_policy *pol)
> +{
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> + lockdep_assert_held(q->queue_lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * This could be the first entry point of blkcg implementation and
> + * we shouldn't allow anything to go through for a bypassing queue.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q)))
> + return ERR_PTR(blk_queue_dying(q) ? -ENODEV : -EBUSY);
> +
> + return __blkg_lookup_create(blkcg, q, gfp, pol);
> +}
> +
> static void blkg_destroy(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
> {
> struct blkcg *blkcg = blkg->blkcg;
> @@ -816,7 +860,7 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
> spin_lock_irq(disk->queue->queue_lock);
>
> if (blkcg_policy_enabled(disk->queue, pol))
> - blkg = blkg_lookup_create(blkcg, disk->queue);
> + blkg = blkg_lookup_create(blkcg, disk->queue, GFP_KERNEL, pol);
> else
> blkg = ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
>
> @@ -1065,14 +1109,9 @@ int blkcg_init_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>
> preloaded = !radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
>
> - /*
> - * Make sure the root blkg exists and count the existing blkgs. As
> - * @q is bypassing at this point, blkg_lookup_create() can't be
> - * used. Open code insertion.
> - */
> rcu_read_lock();
> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> - blkg = blkg_create(&blkcg_root, q, new_blkg);
> + blkg = __blkg_lookup_create(&blkcg_root, q, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
> spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h b/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
> index 01b62e7bac74..955903a8f6cb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
> @@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ extern struct cgroup_subsys_state * const blkcg_root_css;
> struct blkcg_gq *blkg_lookup_slowpath(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> struct request_queue *q, bool update_hint);
> struct blkcg_gq *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> - struct request_queue *q);
> + struct request_queue *q, gfp_t gfp,
> + const struct blkcg_policy *pol);
> int blkcg_init_queue(struct request_queue *q);
> void blkcg_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q);
> void blkcg_exit_queue(struct request_queue *q);
> @@ -694,7 +695,8 @@ static inline bool blkcg_bio_issue_check(struct request_queue *q,
> blkg = blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
> if (unlikely(!blkg)) {
> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> - blkg = blkg_lookup_create(blkcg, q);
> + blkg = blkg_lookup_create(blkcg, q, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN,
> + NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(blkg))
> blkg = NULL;
> spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> --
> 2.12.0.rc1.440.g5b76565f74-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists