lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALrZqyPnQMLJn3yz3c07osksRD9oOp1qt=1Wd-3SO9LLPz14dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 5 Mar 2017 23:14:02 +0530
From:   SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     oleg.drokin@...el.com, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
        jsimmons@...radead.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 5/5] staging: lustre: osc_page.c: Use list_for_each_entry_safe

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
> By the way, the above subject line is not correct.  Normally one does not
> put .c/.h in the subject line.  Indeed, there is not really any
> deterministic algorithm for choosing the subject line.  You need to run
> git log --oneline filename to see what others have done.

So this would be fine Subject:-
staging: lustre: osc_page: Use list_for_each_entry_safe

>
> julia
>
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, simran singhal wrote:
>
>> Doubly linked lists which are  iterated  using list_empty
>> and list_entry macros have been replaced with list_for_each_entry_safe
>> macro.
>> This makes the iteration simpler and more readable.
>>
>> This patch replaces the while loop containing list_empty and list_entry
>> with list_for_each_entry_safe.
>>
>> This was done with Coccinelle.
>>
>> @@
>> expression E1;
>> identifier I1, I2;
>> type T;
>> iterator name list_for_each_entry_safe;
>> @@
>>
>> T *I1;
>> + T *tmp;
>> ...
>> - while (list_empty(&E1) == 0)
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe (I1, tmp, &E1, I2)
>> {
>> ...when != T *I1;
>> - I1 = list_entry(E1.next, T, I2);
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c | 11 ++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
>> index ed8a0dc..e8b974f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
>> @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ long osc_lru_shrink(const struct lu_env *env, struct client_obd *cli,
>>       struct cl_object *clobj = NULL;
>>       struct cl_page **pvec;
>>       struct osc_page *opg;
>> +     struct osc_page *tmp;
>>       int maxscan = 0;
>>       long count = 0;
>>       int index = 0;
>> @@ -572,7 +573,7 @@ long osc_lru_shrink(const struct lu_env *env, struct client_obd *cli,
>>       if (force)
>>               cli->cl_lru_reclaim++;
>>       maxscan = min(target << 1, atomic_long_read(&cli->cl_lru_in_list));
>> -     while (!list_empty(&cli->cl_lru_list)) {
>> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(opg, tmp, &cli->cl_lru_list, ops_lru) {
>>               struct cl_page *page;
>>               bool will_free = false;
>>
>> @@ -582,8 +583,6 @@ long osc_lru_shrink(const struct lu_env *env, struct client_obd *cli,
>>               if (--maxscan < 0)
>>                       break;
>>
>> -             opg = list_entry(cli->cl_lru_list.next, struct osc_page,
>> -                              ops_lru);
>>               page = opg->ops_cl.cpl_page;
>>               if (lru_page_busy(cli, page)) {
>>                       list_move_tail(&opg->ops_lru, &cli->cl_lru_list);
>> @@ -1043,6 +1042,7 @@ unsigned long osc_cache_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *sk,
>>  {
>>       struct client_obd *stop_anchor = NULL;
>>       struct client_obd *cli;
>> +     struct client_obd *tmp;
>>       struct lu_env *env;
>>       long shrank = 0;
>>       u16 refcheck;
>> @@ -1059,10 +1059,7 @@ unsigned long osc_cache_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *sk,
>>               return SHRINK_STOP;
>>
>>       spin_lock(&osc_shrink_lock);
>> -     while (!list_empty(&osc_shrink_list)) {
>> -             cli = list_entry(osc_shrink_list.next, struct client_obd,
>> -                              cl_shrink_list);
>> -
>> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(cli, tmp, &osc_shrink_list, cl_shrink_list) {
>>               if (!stop_anchor)
>>                       stop_anchor = cli;
>>               else if (cli == stop_anchor)
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1488733610-22289-6-git-send-email-singhalsimran0%40gmail.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ