[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170305211254.GA3220@khazad-dum.debian.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 18:12:54 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Arrays of variable length
On Sun, 05 Mar 2017, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com> writes:
> > Sparse complains for arrays declared with variable length
> >
> > 'warning: Variable length array is used'
> >
> > Prior to c99 this was not allowed but lgcc (c99) doesn't have problem
> > with that https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Variable-Length.html.
> > And also Linux kernel compilation with W=1 doesn't complain.
> >
> > Since sparse is used extensively would like to ask what is the correct
> > usage of arrays of variable length
> > within Linux Kernel.
>
> Variable-length arrays are a very bad idea. Don't use them, ever.
> If the size has a sane upper bound, just use that value statically.
> Otherwise, you have a stack overflow waiting to happen and should be
> using some kind of dynamic allocation instead.
>
> Furthermore, use of VLAs generally results in less efficient code. For
> instance, it forces gcc to waste a register for the frame pointer, and
> it often prevents inlining.
Well, if we're going to forbid VLAs in the kernel, IMHO the kernel build
system should call gcc with -Werror=vla to get that point across early,
and flush out any offenders.
--
Henrique Holschuh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists