[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <536a58ba-8896-5639-cab9-bd2f13bed325@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:27:11 +0100
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
fcoe-devel@...n-fcoe.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
open-iscsi@...glegroups.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/29] drivers, s390: convert fc_fcp_pkt.ref_cnt from
atomic_t to refcount_t
On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
The subject is wrong, should be something like "scsi: libfc convert
fc_fcp_pkt.ref_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t" but not s390.
Other than that
Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@...e.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
Powered by blists - more mailing lists