[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170306182754.GB29163@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:27:54 -0800
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/mce: Don't participate in rendezvous process once
nmi_shootdown_cpus() was made
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:16:54PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:36:52PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> > We met an issue for kdump: after kdump kernel boots up,
> > and there comes a broadcasted mce in first kernel, the
> > other cpus remaining in first kernel will enter the old
> > mce handler of first kernel, then timeout and panic due
> > to MCE synchronization, finally reset the kdump cpus.
> >
> > This patch lets cpus stay quiet after nmi_shootdown_cpus(),
> > so after kdump boots, cpus remaining in 1st kernel should
> > not do anything except clearing MCG_STATUS. This is useful
> > for kdump to let vmcore dumping perform as hard as it can.
>
> Ok, I went and rewrote the text to make it more succinct, to the point
> and correct spelling and formatting.
>
> Tony, ACK?
Yes. Looks good now.
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists