linux-kernel - [PATCH-tip v2 3/3] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1488827083-30078-4-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon,  6 Mar 2017 14:04:43 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH-tip v2 3/3] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP

Currently, when down_read() fails, the active read locking isn't undone
until the rwsem_down_read_failed() function grabs the wait_lock. If the
wait_lock is contended, it may takes a while to get the lock. During
that period, writer lock stealing will be disabled because of the
active read lock.

This patch will release the active read lock ASAP when either the
optimisitic spinners are present or the trylock fails so that writer
lock stealing can happen sooner.

On a 2-socket 36-core x86-64 E5-2699 v3 system, a rwsem microbenchmark
was run with 36 locking threads (one/core) doing 50k reader and writer
lock/unlock operations each, the resulting locking rates (avg of 3
runs) on a 4.11-rc1 based kernel were 492.2 Mop/s and 506.4 Mop/s
without and with the patch respectively. That was an increase of
about 3%.

On the same system, a 36-thread fio direct IO random read/write test
(18 read threads & 18 write threads) to the same 2GB file on a XFS
formatted ramdisk was run. The aggregated bandwidths were:

  I/O Type     Before patch   After patch   % Change
  --------     ------------   -----------   --------
  Random read    94.4 MB/s      93.3 MB/s     -1.2%
  Random write  655.5 MB/s     670.9 MB/s     +2.3%

The code change favors write operations. As a result, the read
bandwidth was reduced a bit, but the write bandwidth was increased
proportionally more than the reduction in the read bandwidth.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index be638ca..45cd58d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_has_spinner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 __visible
 struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
+	bool first_in_queue = false;
 	long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
@@ -425,13 +426,30 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	waiter.task = current;
 	waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
 
+	/*
+	 * Undo read bias from down_read operation to stop active locking if:
+	 * 1) Optimistic spinners are present; or
+	 * 2) the wait_lock isn't free.
+	 * Doing that after taking the wait_lock may otherwise block writer
+	 * lock stealing for too long impacting performance.
+	 */
+	if (rwsem_has_spinner(sem) || raw_spin_is_locked(&sem->wait_lock)) {
+		atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS, &sem->count);
+		adjustment = 0;
+	}
+
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
+	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
 		adjustment += RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+		first_in_queue = true;
+	}
 	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
 
-	/* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
-	count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
+	/* we're now waiting on the lock */
+	if (adjustment)
+		count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
+	else
+		count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
 
 	/*
 	 * If there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es).
@@ -440,8 +458,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	 * wake our own waiter to join the existing active readers !
 	 */
 	if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS ||
-	    (count > RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
-	     adjustment != -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS))
+	    (count > RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS && first_in_queue))
 		__rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q);
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-- 
1.8.3.1