[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170306210744.sqc6xcursbcerfsl@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:07:44 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] in-kernel resource manager
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 05:19:01PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> This patch set adds support for TPM spaces that provide an isolated
> execution context for transient objects and HMAC and policy sessions. A
> space is swapped into TPM volatile memory only when it is used and
> swapped out after the use.
>
> There's a test script for trying out TPM spaces in
>
> git://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/tpm2-scripts.git
>
> A simple smoke test suite can be run by
>
> sudo python -m unittest -v tpm2_smoke.SpaceTest
>
> v3:
> * Reverted back to /dev/tpmrm0 that was actually James' original
> proposal. It's the most pragmatic choice as it cannot be mixed
> with other TPM 2.0 and kernel idioms easily.
>
> v2:
> * Substitute virtual handle in ContextSave.
> * Substitute virtual handles in GetCapability.
> * Validate that the real response length and the one reported in the
> header match in tpm_transmit().
>
>
> James Bottomley (3):
> tpm: split out tpm-dev.c into tpm-dev.c and tpm-common-dev.c
> tpm: expose spaces via a device link /dev/tpmrm<n>
> tpm2: add session handle context saving and restoring to the space
> code
>
> Jarkko Sakkinen (4):
> tpm: move length validation to tpm_transmit()
> tpm: validate TPM 2.0 commands
> tpm: export tpm2_flush_context_cmd
> tpm: infrastructure for TPM spaces
>
> drivers/char/tpm/Makefile | 3 +-
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 71 ++++-
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c | 148 +++++++++++
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev.c | 143 +---------
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev.h | 27 ++
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 131 +++++++---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 49 +++-
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 173 +++++++++----
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c | 532 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/char/tpm/tpmrm-dev.c | 65 +++++
> 11 files changed, 1123 insertions(+), 221 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/char/tpm/tpmrm-dev.c
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Should I put this available to linux-next? I would think it would
make sense. I'm still looking forward to get more reviewed-by's
and tested-by's but that way it might be easier to get those...
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists