[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170306065338.GA31202@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 07:53:38 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Stenglein <mark@...ngle.in>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: wlan-ng: hfa384x.h: fixed a newline coding
style issue
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 09:09:12PM -0500, Mark Stenglein wrote:
> Fixed a coding style issue.
What issue would that be?
> Signed-off-by: Mark Stenglein <mark@...ngle.in>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h
> index 5f1851c85f12..f19984747b1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h
> @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ struct hfa384x_usbctlx {
> enum ctlx_state state; /* Tracks running state */
>
> struct completion done;
> +
> volatile int reapable; /* Food for the reaper task */
What is wrong with the original code here?
Please don't blindly trust checkpatch.pl all the time, sometimes you
have to use your brain when reading the results.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists