lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170307045236.GC3913@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:52:36 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] device: Stop requiring that struct device is
 embedded in struct pci_dev

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:35:48PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The dma mapping operations of several architectures and also of
> several I/O MMU implementations need to translate a struct
> device pointer into a struct pci_dev pointer. This translation
> is performed by to_pci_dev(). That macro assumes that struct
> device is embedded in struct pci_dev. However, that is not the
> case for the device structure in struct ib_device.

Then don't blindly cast it backwards!  Fix that up, an ib device should
have access to the dma structures that the PCI device it depends on has.
If not, you need to set that up properly in the IB core, don't mess with
the driver core for this at all.

Somehow all other subsystems work just fine, don't instantly think that
the driver core needs to bend to the will of the IB code, because you
are somehow "special".  Hint, you aren't :)

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ