[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170307075303.GS6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:53:03 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kernel test robot <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, kitsunyan <kitsunyan@...ox.ru>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] 4c77b18cf8: hackbench.throughput
-14.4% regression
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:18:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -14.4% regression of hackbench.throughput due to commit:
Yeah, I know ... this patch is a mixed bag, some like it, some hate it.
But given it was fingered by a human doing desktopy things that trumps
artificial benchmark.
Still, I'll try and see if I can fix thing once I find a spare moment.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists