[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170307103812.yuv7tlfsjmxfmyyr@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:38:12 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/head_64.S: Rename start_cpu()
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:06:38AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The local labels syntax is silly, I always end up looking twice to make sense of
> 'Ljump' or 'Lwhatever' ;-)
>
> We cannot do anything about that - but we can name our symbols to work it around.
> But the price is the extra underscore in the symbol name...
Sure, but other labels in this file don't have the preceding "_".
Perhaps we should agree on a convention for the local labels naming in
our asm and adhere to it...
Hmm.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists