linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/10] serdev: add serdev_device_wait_until

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+BCE1u6Ysz0FOdh--wHm-PZxqcmqTgQMyDcvQNkYp3gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:34:49 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] serdev: add serdev_device_wait_until_sent

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> wrote:
> Add method, which waits until the transmission buffer has been sent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serdev/core.c           | 11 +++++++++++
>  drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/serdev.h              |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> index f4c6c90add78..a63b74031e22 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,17 @@ void serdev_device_set_flow_control(struct serdev_device *serdev, bool enable)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serdev_device_set_flow_control);
>
> +void serdev_device_wait_until_sent(struct serdev_device *serdev, long timeout)
> +{
> +       struct serdev_controller *ctrl = serdev->ctrl;
> +
> +       if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops->wait_until_sent)
> +               return;
> +
> +       ctrl->ops->wait_until_sent(ctrl, timeout);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serdev_device_wait_until_sent);
> +
>  static int serdev_drv_probe(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         const struct serdev_device_driver *sdrv = to_serdev_device_driver(dev->driver);
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> index d05393594f15..db2bc601e554 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/serdev.h>
>  #include <linux/tty.h>
>  #include <linux/tty_driver.h>
> +#include <linux/poll.h>
>
>  #define SERPORT_ACTIVE         1
>
> @@ -47,10 +48,13 @@ static void ttyport_write_wakeup(struct tty_port *port)
>         struct serport *serport = serdev_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
>
>         if (!test_and_clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &port->tty->flags))
> -               return;
> +               goto out;
>
>         if (test_bit(SERPORT_ACTIVE, &serport->flags))
>                 serdev_controller_write_wakeup(ctrl);
> +
> +out:
> +       wake_up_interruptible_poll(&port->tty->write_wait, POLLOUT);

Shouldn't this be separate patch?

Rob