linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Xen transport for 9pfs frontend driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:27:05 -0800 (PST)
From:   Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To:     Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
cc:     Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, jgross@...e.com, lucho@...kov.net,
        ericvh@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, rminnich@...dia.gov,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Xen transport for 9pfs frontend driver

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:00:41PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > This patch series implements a new transport for 9pfs, aimed at Xen
> > systems.
> > 
> > The transport is based on a traditional Xen frontend and backend drivers
> > pair. This patch series implements the frontend, which typically runs in
> > a regular unprivileged guest.
> > 
> > I'll follow up with another series that implements the backend in
> > userspace in QEMU, which typically runs in Dom0 (but could also run in
> > a another guest).
> > 
> > The frontend complies to the Xen transport for 9pfs specification
> > version 1, available here:
> > 
> > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob_plain;f=docs/misc/9pfs.markdown;hb=HEAD
> 
> Kind of tangential to this series, but maybe it would make sense to implement
> this transport in a fuse based 9pfs driver? I see there are already several
> fuse-9pfs implementations around. Something for a GSoC/Outreach project?

Sure. Additionally, with open source frontends and backends already
available, it should be easier to code. I am happy to co-mentor the
project with you, if you feel like it.