[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170307170751.n6tvrztet724pxfl@lukather>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:07:51 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Allwinner H5 and Orange Pi PC2 support
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 01:17:44AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Allwinner H5 is a 64-bit SoC with a design like the 32-bit
> H3, and it's pin-to-pin compatible with H3.
>
> This patchset adds support for it, along with the first available
> board -- Orange Pi PC2.
>
> Several H5 boards by Sinovoip Banana Pi and FriendlyARM Nano Pi
> are coming, so we should get ready for them.
>
> CCU changes are already said to be merged by Maxime Ripard, so
> this patchset now contains only device tree patches.
>
> Commit messages are changed by the suggestion of Maxime.
>
> This patchset depends on patchset [1] to finally take effect. At
> least the patch 1 of that patchset is needed if you want to test
> the kernel image -- without it the pinctrl driver won't be built
> and the kernel will become unusable without pinctrl.
It's still not the prefixes I told you to use. I merged your patches
and fixed, but please use the right one next time (and be consistent
in your ARM vs arm usage).
Thanks for your work!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists