[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170307154843.32516-2-mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:48:40 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] s390: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
page_table_alloc then uses the flag for a single page allocation. This
means that this flag has never been actually useful here because it has
always been used only for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.
An earlier attempt to remove the flag 10d58bf297e2 ("s390: get rid of
superfluous __GFP_REPEAT") has missed this one but the situation is very
same here.
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
---
arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c b/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
index 995f78532cc2..2776bad61094 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ struct page *page_table_alloc_pgste(struct mm_struct *mm)
struct page *page;
unsigned long *table;
- page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_REPEAT);
+ page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (page) {
table = (unsigned long *) page_to_phys(page);
clear_table(table, _PAGE_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE/2);
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists