[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170308064147.GG11206@bbox>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:41:47 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <kernel-team@....com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 05/11] mm: make the try_to_munlock void function
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:17:47PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:39:19PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > try_to_munlock returns SWAP_MLOCK if the one of VMAs mapped
> > the page has VM_LOCKED flag. In that time, VM set PG_mlocked to
> > the page if the page is not pte-mapped THP which cannot be
> > mlocked, either.
> >
> > With that, __munlock_isolated_page can use PageMlocked to check
> > whether try_to_munlock is successful or not without relying on
> > try_to_munlock's retval. It helps to make ttu/ttuo simple with
> > upcoming patches.
>
> I *think* you're correct, but it took time to wrap my head around.
> We basically rely on try_to_munlock() never caller for PTE-mapped THP.
> And we don't at the moment.
>
> It worth adding something like
>
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageCompound(page) && PageDoubleMap(page), page);
>
> into try_to_munlock().
Agree.
>
> Otherwise looks good to me.
>
> Will free adding my Acked-by once this nit is addressed.
Thanks for the review this part, Kirill!
>
> --
> Kirill A. Shutemov
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists