linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANRm+CxXov_A+ufuQNOmTkfm8vkw2Gogb=J7iN07O=ukokGWug@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:47:40 +0800
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by
 delayed NO_HZ accounting

2017-02-17 20:07 GMT+08:00 Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>:
> If we crossed a sample window while in NO_HZ we will add LOAD_FREQ to
> the pending sample window time on exit, setting the next update not
> one window into the future, but two.
>
> This situation on exiting NO_HZ is described by:
>
>   this_rq->calc_load_update < jiffies < calc_load_update
>
> In this scenario, what we should be doing is:
>
>   this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update               [ next window ]
>
> But what we actually do is:
>
>   this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update + LOAD_FREQ   [ next+1 window ]
>
> This has the effect of delaying load average updates for potentially
> up to ~9seconds.
>
> This can result in huge spikes in the load average values due to
> per-cpu uninterruptible task counts being out of sync when accumulated
> across all CPUs.
>
> It's safe to update the per-cpu active count if we wake between sample
> windows because any load that we left in 'calc_load_idle' will have
> been zero'd when the idle load was folded in calc_global_load().
>
> This issue is easy to reproduce before,
>
>   commit 9d89c257dfb9 ("sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking")
>
> just by forking short-lived process pipelines built from ps(1) and
> grep(1) in a loop. I'm unable to reproduce the spikes after that
> commit, but the bug still seems to be present from code review.
>
> Fixes: commit 5167e8d ("sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again")
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.5+
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>

> ---
>  kernel/sched/loadavg.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Changes in v2:
>
>  - Folded in Peter's suggestion for how to fix this.
>
>  - Tried to clairfy the changelog based on feedback from Peter and
>    Frederic
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
> index a2d6eb71f06b..ec91fcc09bfe 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
> @@ -201,8 +201,9 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void)
>         struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
>
>         /*
> -        * If we're still before the sample window, we're done.
> +        * If we're still before the pending sample window, we're done.
>          */
> +       this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update;
>         if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update))
>                 return;
>
> @@ -211,7 +212,6 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void)
>          * accounted through the nohz accounting, so skip the entire deal and
>          * sync up for the next window.
>          */
> -       this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update;
>         if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update + 10))
>                 this_rq->calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ;
>  }
> --
> 2.10.0
>