[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170308094526.GA30552@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:45:26 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Cheah Kok Cheong <thrust73@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, abbotti@....co.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: comedi: comedi_fops: Change
comedi_num_legacy_minors type
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:38:12PM +0800, Cheah Kok Cheong wrote:
> Dear Greg,
> Thanks for taking the time to review.
>
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:01:38PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 03:22:32AM +0800, Cheah Kok Cheong wrote:
> > > Change to unsigned to allow removal of negative value check in
> > > init section.
> >
> > Why?
> >
>
> User can input a -ve number as parameter for module loading.
Then they are foolish to do so :)
> This will be caught by the mentioned check and cause loading to fail.
> I think the original intention here is to inform user via kernel log
> the acceptable input range.
Either is fine.
> Now if a user doesn't know how to access the log, it's of no help.
They know how to set a module parameter as root but do not know of the
kernel log? That's trying a bit too hard :)
> If a user does know how to access the log, probably also know how
> to use modinfo or know that reserving a -ve number of minors is
> not acceptable.
>
> IMHO, this check is pointless and best enforced in module_param.
Ok, but it's really a minor, or no, real issue at all here.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists