[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170308092251.GC11028@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:22:51 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Cristopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmalloc: use __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly
On Tue 07-03-17 15:08:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:10:20 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > __vmalloc* allows users to provide gfp flags for the underlying
> > allocation. This API is quite popular
> > $ git grep "=[[:space:]]__vmalloc\|return[[:space:]]*__vmalloc" | wc -l
> > 77
> >
> > the only problem is that many people are not aware that they really want
> > to give __GFP_HIGHMEM along with other flags because there is really no
> > reason to consume precious lowmemory on CONFIG_HIGHMEM systems for pages
> > which are mapped to the kernel vmalloc space. About half of users don't
> > use this flag, though. This signals that we make the API unnecessarily
> > too complex.
> >
> > This patch simply uses __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly when allocating pages to
> > be mapped to the vmalloc space. Current users which add __GFP_HIGHMEM
> > are simplified and drop the flag.
>
> hm. What happens if a caller wants only lowmem pages? Drivers do
> weird stuff...
Yes they do and we have vmalloc_32 API which works as intended because
GFP_VMALLOC32 contains GFP_DMA32 and that will override __GFP_HIGHMEM.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists