[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2be8ba18-21ed-a990-70d1-12be80ed13d2@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:30:46 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't overwrite node block by SSR
On 2017/3/7 5:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch fixes that SSR can overwrite previous warm node block consisting of
> a node chain since the last checkpoint.
Good catch!
Need to consider the impact to other accesser, e.g. is_checkpointed_data,
add_discard_addrs?
Thanks,
>
> Fixes: 5b6c6be2d878 ("f2fs: use SSR for warm node as well")
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 2ae36d04d03e..684b869e1861 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1177,6 +1177,12 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
> if (f2fs_discard_en(sbi) &&
> !f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->discard_map))
> sbi->discard_blks--;
> +
> + /* don't overwrite by SSR to keep node chain */
> + if (se->type == CURSEG_WARM_NODE) {
> + if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> + se->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
> + }
> } else {
> if (!f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset, se->cur_valid_map)) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists