| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALZtONAZDsyfkhywwwbn5mbtHBF1Uo-gq0q2_DSw-ycKeNdyzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:43:21 -0500
From: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
To: srividya.dr@...sung.com
Cc: Sarbojit Ganguly <unixman.linuxboy@...il.com>,
"sjenning@...hat.com" <sjenning@...hat.com>,
"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dinakar Reddy Pathireddy <dinakar.p@...sung.com>,
SHARAN ALLUR <sharan.allur@...sung.com>,
SUNEEL KUMAR SURIMANI <suneel@...sung.com>,
JUHUN KIM <juhunkim@...sung.com>,
Sarbojit Ganguly <ganguly.s@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zswap: Zero-filled pages handling
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Srividya Desireddy
<srividya.dr@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 02:55 AM, Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Sarbojit Ganguly
>> <unixman.linuxboy@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On 25 February 2017 at 20:12, Srividya Desireddy
>>> <srividya.dr@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Srividya Desireddy <srividya.dr@...sung.com>
>>>> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:04:06 +0530
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] zswap: Zero-filled pages handling
>>
>> your email is base64-encoded; please send plain text emails.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Zswap is a cache which compresses the pages that are being swapped out
>>>> and stores them into a dynamically allocated RAM-based memory pool.
>>>> Experiments have shown that around 10-20% of pages stored in zswap
>>>> are zero-filled pages (i.e. contents of the page are all zeros), but
>>
>> 20%? that's a LOT of zero pages...which seems like applications are
>> wasting a lot of memory. what kind of workload are you testing with?
>>
>
> I have tested this patch with different workloaded on different devices.
> On Ubuntu PC with 2GB RAM, while executing kernel build and other test
> scripts ~15% of pages in zswap were zero pages. With multimedia workload
> more than 20% of zswap pages were found to be zero pages.
> On a ARM Quad Core 32-bit device with 1.5GB RAM an average 10% of zero
> pages were found on launching and relaunching 15 applications.
>
>>>> these pages are handled as normal pages by compressing and allocating
>>>> memory in the pool.
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds a check in zswap_frontswap_store() to identify zero-filled
>>>> page before compression of the page. If the page is a zero-filled page, set
>>>> zswap_entry.zeroflag and skip the compression of the page and alloction
>>>> of memory in zpool. In zswap_frontswap_load(), check if the zeroflag is
>>>> set for the page in zswap_entry. If the flag is set, memset the page with
>>>> zero. This saves the decompression time during load.
>>>>
>>>> The overall overhead caused to check for a zero-filled page is very minimal
>>>> when compared to the time saved by avoiding compression and allocation in
>>>> case of zero-filled pages. Although, compressed size of a zero-filled page
>>>> is very less, with this patch load time of a zero-filled page is reduced by
>>>> 80% when compared to baseline.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to share the benchmark details?
>>
>> Was there an answer to this?
>>
>
> This patch is tested on a ARM Quad Core 32-bit device with 1.5GB RAM by
> launching and relaunching different applications. With the patch, an
> average of 5000 pages zero pages found in zswap out of the ~50000 pages
> stored in zswap and application launch time improved by ~3%.
>
> Test Parameters Baseline With patch Improvement
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Total RAM 1343MB 1343MB
> Available RAM 451MB 445MB -6MB
> Avg. Memfree 69MB 70MB 1MB
> Avg. Swap Used 226MB 215MB -11MB
> Avg. App entry time 644msec 623msec 3%
>
> With patch, every page swapped to zswap is checked if it is a zero
> page or not and for all the zero pages compression and memory allocation
> operations are skipped. Overall there is an improvement of 30% in zswap
> store time.
> In case of non-zero pages there is no overhead during zswap page load. For
> zero pages there is a improvement of more than 60% in the zswap load time
> as the zero page decompression is avoided.
>
> The below table shows the execution time profiling of the patch.
>
> Zswap Store Operation Baseline With patch % Improvement
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> * Zero page check -- 22.5ms
> (for non-zero pages)
> * Zero page check -- 24ms
> (for zero pages)
> * Compression time 55ms --
> (of zero pages)
> * Allocation time 14ms --
> (to store compressed
> zero pages)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Total 69ms 46.5ms 32%
>
> Zswap Load Operation Baseline With patch % Improvement
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> * Decompression time 30.4ms --
> (of zero pages)
> * Zero page check + -- 10.04ms
> memset operation
> (of zero pages)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Total 30.4ms 10.04ms 66%
>
> *The execution times may vary with test device used.
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Srividya Desireddy <srividya.dr@...sung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/zswap.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
>>>> index 067a0d6..a574008 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/zswap.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/zswap.c
>>>> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
>>>> static u64 zswap_pool_total_size;
>>>> /* The number of compressed pages currently stored in zswap */
>>>> static atomic_t zswap_stored_pages = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>>>> +/* The number of zero filled pages swapped out to zswap */
>>>> +static atomic_t zswap_zero_pages = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * The statistics below are not protected from concurrent access for
>>>> @@ -140,6 +142,8 @@ struct zswap_pool {
>>>> * decompression
>>>> * pool - the zswap_pool the entry's data is in
>>>> * handle - zpool allocation handle that stores the compressed page data
>>>> + * zeroflag - the flag is set if the content of the page is filled with
>>>> + * zeros
>>>> */
>>>> struct zswap_entry {
>>>> struct rb_node rbnode;
>>>> @@ -148,6 +152,7 @@ struct zswap_entry {
>>>> unsigned int length;
>>>> struct zswap_pool *pool;
>>>> unsigned long handle;
>>>> + unsigned char zeroflag;
>>
>> instead of a flag, we can use length == 0; the length will never be 0
>> for any actually compressed page.
>>
>
> I tested the patch using entry->length itself as flag for marking zero pages.
> It works fine and the functionality is same. Should I resend with this change
> updated?
yes, the patch looks good otherwise, please resend with the
entry->length change. Feel free to include the testing/benchmark
details in the commit message, it's interesting data.
thanks!
>
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct zswap_header {
>>>> @@ -236,6 +241,7 @@ static struct zswap_entry *zswap_entry_cache_alloc(gfp_t gfp)
>>>> if (!entry)
>>>> return NULL;
>>>> entry->refcount = 1;
>>>> + entry->zeroflag = 0;
>>>> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&entry->rbnode);
>>>> return entry;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -306,8 +312,12 @@ static void zswap_rb_erase(struct rb_root *root, struct zswap_entry *entry)
>>>> */
>>>> static void zswap_free_entry(struct zswap_entry *entry)
>>>> {
>>>> - zpool_free(entry->pool->zpool, entry->handle);
>>>> - zswap_pool_put(entry->pool);
>>>> + if (entry->zeroflag)
>>>> + atomic_dec(&zswap_zero_pages);
>>>> + else {
>>>> + zpool_free(entry->pool->zpool, entry->handle);
>>>> + zswap_pool_put(entry->pool);
>>>> + }
>>>> zswap_entry_cache_free(entry);
>>>> atomic_dec(&zswap_stored_pages);
>>>> zswap_update_total_size();
>>>> @@ -877,6 +887,19 @@ static int zswap_shrink(void)
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static int zswap_is_page_zero_filled(void *ptr)
>>>> +{
>>>> + unsigned int pos;
>>>> + unsigned long *page;
>>>> +
>>>> + page = (unsigned long *)ptr;
>>>> + for (pos = 0; pos != PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(*page); pos++) {
>>>> + if (page[pos])
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> + return 1;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /*********************************
>>>> * frontswap hooks
>>>> **********************************/
>>>> @@ -917,6 +940,15 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_store(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset,
>>>> goto reject;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + src = kmap_atomic(page);
>>>> + if (zswap_is_page_zero_filled(src)) {
>>>> + kunmap_atomic(src);
>>>> + entry->offset = offset;
>>>> + entry->zeroflag = 1;
>>>> + atomic_inc(&zswap_zero_pages);
>>>> + goto insert_entry;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> /* if entry is successfully added, it keeps the reference */
>>>> entry->pool = zswap_pool_current_get();
>>>> if (!entry->pool) {
>>>> @@ -927,7 +959,6 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_store(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset,
>>>> /* compress */
>>>> dst = get_cpu_var(zswap_dstmem);
>>>> tfm = *get_cpu_ptr(entry->pool->tfm);
>>>> - src = kmap_atomic(page);
>>>> ret = crypto_comp_compress(tfm, src, PAGE_SIZE, dst, &dlen);
>>>> kunmap_atomic(src);
>>>> put_cpu_ptr(entry->pool->tfm);
>>>> @@ -961,6 +992,7 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_store(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset,
>>>> entry->handle = handle;
>>>> entry->length = dlen;
>>>>
>>>> +insert_entry:
>>>> /* map */
>>>> spin_lock(&tree->lock);
>>>> do {
>>>> @@ -1013,6 +1045,13 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_load(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset,
>>>> }
>>>> spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
>>>>
>>>> + if (entry->zeroflag) {
>>>> + dst = kmap_atomic(page);
>>>> + memset(dst, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
>>>> + kunmap_atomic(dst);
>>>> + goto freeentry;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> /* decompress */
>>>> dlen = PAGE_SIZE;
>>>> src = (u8 *)zpool_map_handle(entry->pool->zpool, entry->handle,
>>>> @@ -1025,6 +1064,7 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_load(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset,
>>>> zpool_unmap_handle(entry->pool->zpool, entry->handle);
>>>> BUG_ON(ret);
>>>>
>>>> +freeentry:
>>>> spin_lock(&tree->lock);
>>>> zswap_entry_put(tree, entry);
>>>> spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
>>>> @@ -1133,6 +1173,8 @@ static int __init zswap_debugfs_init(void)
>>>> zswap_debugfs_root, &zswap_pool_total_size);
>>>> debugfs_create_atomic_t("stored_pages", S_IRUGO,
>>>> zswap_debugfs_root, &zswap_stored_pages);
>>>> + debugfs_create_atomic_t("zero_pages", 0444,
>>>> + zswap_debugfs_root, &zswap_zero_pages);
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Sarbojit
Powered by blists - more mailing lists