[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703081602460.3521@nanos>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:06:23 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
cc: "Hadimani, Jagadish" <Jagadish.Hadimani@....com>,
"Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel without RTC
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 08/03/2017 at 13:33:33 +0000, Hadimani, Jagadish wrote:
> > Hello Alexandre,
> >
> > I guess the Linux kernel uses HPET timer...
> > But can we can force Linux kernel to use Tsc or per core timer...
> >
>
> That is probably the case but your are targeting the wrong subsystem.
> The timekeeping is done using two different devices: clocksource and
> clockevent. Usually, the drivers are in drivers/clocksource. I'm
> definitively not an expert in x86 but the clockevent seems to be
> registered from arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c and the clocksource from
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
>
> IIRC the clocksource is optional but the clockevent is mandatory so if
> you don't have an HPET, you will need to register a clockevent device
> from somewhere else.
>
> Maybe the simplest thing to do is to ask the x86 maintainers and the
> time maintainers. Luckily for you, they are the same people (Thomas and
> Ingo, added in cc).
The scheduler uses TSC anyway.
The RTC is only used for setting the wall clock time at boot and for
figuring out the time a system spent in suspend. If you don't have an RTC
then the boot wall clock time will be simply 1/1/1970 00:00:00.
Jagadish, can you please explain what your problem is. Does the system fail
to boot or does it behave strange or what?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists