[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170308154357.GB13133@leverpostej>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:43:57 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:27:11PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > As in my other reply, I'd prefer that we wrapped the (arch-specific)
> > atomic implementations such that we can instrument them explicitly in a
> > core header. That means that the implementation and semantics of the
> > atomics don't change at all.
> >
> > Note that we could initially do this just for x86 and arm64), e.g. by
> > having those explicitly include an <asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h>
> > at the end of their <asm/atomic.h>.
>
> How exactly do you want to do this incrementally?
> I don't feel ready to shuffle all archs, but doing x86 in one patch
> and then arm64 in another looks tractable.
I guess we'd have three patches: one adding the header and any core
infrastructure, followed by separate patches migrating arm64 and x86
over.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists