[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170308155059.GA4353@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:50:59 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: darrick.wong@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] fs, xfs: convert xlog_ticket.t_ref from atomic_t to
refcount_t
> - ASSERT(atomic_read(&ticket->t_ref) > 0);
> - atomic_inc(&ticket->t_ref);
> + ASSERT(refcount_read(&ticket->t_ref) > 0);
> + refcount_inc(&ticket->t_ref);
With strict refcount semantics refcount_inc should check that
the count is larger than 0, otherwise we'd need to use
recount_inc_not_zero or whatever you're going to call it.
Is that something the recount code does / could do?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists