[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQP56_XUPhGfMX7EGb29SyNCBKkxt43sRXbU6C27mOUQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:31:25 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: nand: Remove unused chip->write_page() hook
2017-03-08 3:34 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 21:04:50 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> 2017-02-20 21:28 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>:
>> > The last/only user of the chip->write_page() hook (the Atmel NAND
>> > controller driver) has been reworked and is no longer specifying a custom
>> > ->write_page() implementation.
>> > Drop this hook before someone else start abusing it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
>>
>>
>> Just a minor comment.
>>
>>
>> /**
>> * nand_write_page - [REPLACEABLE] write one page
>> * @mtd: MTD device structure
>>
>>
>> Can you update the comment block for nand_write_page(), too?
>>
>> [REPLACEABLE] -> [INTERNAL]
>
> I think I'll just drop it, it does not mean anything to flag a static
> function as replaceable (the ->write_page() method could be overloaded,
> but not the nand_write_page() implementation itself).
>
Sounds good to me. Thank you!
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists