[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170308163434.obhtg6fwmjwqv7jm@kozik-lap>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:34:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sergio Prado <sergio.prado@...abworks.com>
Cc: kgene@...nel.org, javier@....samsung.com, tomasz.figa@...il.com,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: fix segfault when using external
interrupts on s3c24xx
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:15:16AM -0400, Sergio Prado wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> > > This is a regression from commit 8b1bd11c1f8f529057369c5b3702d13fd24e2765.
> >
> > Checkpatch should complain here about commit format.
> >
> > >
> > > Tested on FriendlyARM mini2440.
> > >
> >
> > Please add:
> > Fixes: 8b1bd11c1f8f ("pinctrl: samsung: Add the support the multiple IORESOURCE_MEM for one pin-bank")
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> >
>
> OK.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado <sergio.prado@...abworks.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c
> > > index b82a003546ae..1b8d887796e8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c
> > > @@ -356,8 +356,8 @@ static inline void s3c24xx_demux_eint(struct irq_desc *desc,
> > > {
> > > struct s3c24xx_eint_data *data = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > > struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> > > - struct irq_data *irqd = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> > > - struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> > > + struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = data->drvdata;
> > > + struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = d->pin_banks;
> >
> > I think 'pin_banks' point to all banks of given controller not to the
> > currently accessed one.
>
> Understood. I think it worked in my tests because on s3c2440 all banks
> have the same eint base address.
>
> So what do you think is the best approach to solve this problem?
Maybe you can get to this through:
s3c24xx_eint_domain_data = s3c24xx_eint_data->domains[virq].host_data;
s3c24xx_eint_domain_data->bank
It is getting slightly more complicated...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists