[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3f25bf400da5c222cd9b10eec6ded2d6b58209f8.1488991670.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:34:15 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [TRIVIAL PATCH 2/2] kprobes: Convert kprobe_exceptions_notify to use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL
commit fc62d0207ae0 ("kprobes: Introduce weak variant of
kprobe_exceptions_notify()") used the __kprobes annotation to exclude
kprobe_exceptions_notify from being probed. Since NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() is a
better way to do this enabling the symbol to be discovered as being
blacklisted, change over to using NOKPROBE_SYMBOL().
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 699c5bc51a92..b52d952d6d41 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1740,11 +1740,12 @@ void unregister_kprobes(struct kprobe **kps, int num)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_kprobes);
-int __weak __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
- unsigned long val, void *data)
+int __weak kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
+ unsigned long val, void *data)
{
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_exceptions_notify);
static struct notifier_block kprobe_exceptions_nb = {
.notifier_call = kprobe_exceptions_notify,
--
2.11.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists