[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170308124654.10e598f2@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:46:54 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: SysRq nice-all-RT-tasks is broken
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:40:12 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> I wonder if we should just have a special flag sent by that sysrq
> trigger. Since it is causing all tasks to go "nice" there's no need to
> do the pi chain walk in __sched_setscheduler().
Hah, there already is a flag!
Laurent, can you test this patch:
-- Steve
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3b31fc0..7292fa9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4129,8 +4129,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
int queue_flags = DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE;
struct rq *rq;
- /* May grab non-irq protected spin_locks: */
- BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
+ /* The pi code expects interrupts enabled */
+ BUG_ON(pi && in_interrupt());
recheck:
/* Double check policy once rq lock held: */
if (policy < 0) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists