[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170309070129.GA13741@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:01:29 +0100
From: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, stas.yakovlev@...il.com,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/19] net: e100: Replace PCI pool old API
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 02:40:25PM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:19 +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
> > The PCI pool API is deprecated. This commit replaces the PCI pool old
> > API by the appropriate function with the DMA pool API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
> > Acked-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>
> > Tested-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 12 ++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>
> My only concern is:
> - what hardware did this get tested with? Since this affects all e100
> parts, it would be hard to believe that all the affected hardware was
> used in testing.
This was tested by compilation only(See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/8/661). However this series removes macro
definitions of the old pci_pool interface and replace call sites by what
the macra was calling.
Here are the macros that this series removes from include/pci.h:
#define pci_pool dma_pool
#define pci_pool_create(name, pdev, size, align, allocation) \
dma_pool_create(name, &pdev->dev, size, align, allocation)
#define pci_pool_destroy(pool) dma_pool_destroy(pool)
#define pci_pool_alloc(pool, flags, handle) dma_pool_alloc(pool, flags, handle)
#define pci_pool_zalloc(pool, flags, handle) \
dma_pool_zalloc(pool, flags, handle)
#define pci_pool_free(pool, vaddr, addr) dma_pool_free(pool, vaddr, add
So this should not affect run time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists