[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58C0FE98.3080903@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 15:04:56 +0800
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
CC: "virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org" <virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Liang Li <liliang.opensource@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 kernel 5/5] This patch contains two parts:
On 03/06/2017 09:23 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:Am 03.03.2017 um 06:40
schrieb Wei Wang:
>> From: Liang Li <liang.z.li@...el.com>
Sorry, I just saw the message due to an email issue.
> I'd prefer to split this into two parts then and to create proper subjects.
Agree, will do.
>
> If I remember correctly, the general concept was accepted by most reviewers.
>
Yes, that's also what I was told.
Best,
Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists