lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:41:22 +0800
From:   Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
To:     Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        <will.deacon@....com>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
        <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        <lv.zheng@...el.com>, <nkaje@...eaurora.org>,
        <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <james.morse@....com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <eun.taik.lee@...sung.com>, <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
        <labbott@...hat.com>, <shijie.huang@....com>,
        <rruigrok@...eaurora.org>, <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        <tn@...ihalf.com>, <fu.wei@...aro.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        <bristot@...hat.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...ica.org>,
        <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>, <punit.agrawal@....com>,
        <astone@...hat.com>, <harba@...eaurora.org>,
        <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        <shiju.jose@...wei.com>, <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 09/10] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event

Hi Tyler Baicar,

On 2017/3/7 4:45, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> Currently there are trace events for the various RAS
> errors with the exception of ARM processor type errors.
> Add a new trace event for such errors so that the user
> will know when they occur. These trace events are
> consistent with the ARM processor error section type
> defined in UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c    |  8 +++++++-
>  drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c |  1 +
>  drivers/ras/ras.c           |  1 +
>  include/ras/ras_event.h     | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 842c0cc..81d7b79 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -514,7 +514,13 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>  		}
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RAS
> -		else if (trace_unknown_sec_event_enabled()) {
> +		else if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM) &&
> +			 trace_arm_event_enabled()) {
> +			struct cper_sec_proc_arm *arm_err;
> +
> +			arm_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
> +			trace_arm_event(arm_err);
> +		} else if (trace_unknown_sec_event_enabled()) {
>  			void *unknown_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
>  			trace_unknown_sec_event(&sec_type,
>  					fru_id, fru_text, sec_sev,
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index 545a6c2..e9fb56a 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>  #include <linux/printk.h>
>  #include <linux/bcd.h>
>  #include <acpi/ghes.h>
> +#include <ras/ras_event.h>
>  
>  #define INDENT_SP	" "
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/ras.c b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> index fb2500b..8ba5a94 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> @@ -28,3 +28,4 @@ static int __init ras_init(void)
>  #endif
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(mc_event);
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(unknown_sec_event);
> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_event);
> diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
> index 5861b6f..b36db48 100644
> --- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
> +++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,40 @@
>  );
>  
>  /*
> + * ARM Processor Events Report
> + *
> + * This event is generated when hardware detects an ARM processor error
> + * has occurred. UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
> + */
> +TRACE_EVENT(arm_event,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(const struct cper_sec_proc_arm *proc),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(proc),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(u64, mpidr)
> +		__field(u64, midr)
> +		__field(u32, running_state)
> +		__field(u32, psci_state)
> +		__field(u8, affinity)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->affinity = proc->affinity_level;
> +		__entry->mpidr = proc->mpidr;
> +		__entry->midr = proc->midr;
> +		__entry->running_state = proc->running_state;
> +		__entry->psci_state = proc->psci_state;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("affinity level: %d; MPIDR: %016llx; MIDR: %016llx; "
> +		  "running state: %d; PSCI state: %d",
> +		  __entry->affinity, __entry->mpidr, __entry->midr,
> +		  __entry->running_state, __entry->psci_state)
> +);
> +

I think these fields are not enough, we need also export arm processor error
information (UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.1), or at least the error type,
address, etc. So that the userspace (such as rasdaemon tool) could know what
error occurred.

Thanks,
Xie XiuQi

> +/*
>   * Unknown Section Report
>   *
>   * This event is generated when hardware detected a hardware
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ