[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7939e90b-4fe0-d07a-82b4-73cb0f4407fc@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:33:26 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: optimize local IRQ disable time before vmentry
On 09/03/2017 13:16, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>
> Commit b95234c84 (kvm: x86: do not use KVM_REQ_EVENT for APICv interrupt
> injection) disables interrupts before setting vcpu->mode to fix an race:
>
> | The IPI for posted interrupts may be issued between setting vcpu->mode =
> | IN_GUEST_MODE and disabling interrupts. If that happens,
> | kvm_trigger_posted_interrupt returns true, but smp_kvm_posted_intr_ipi
> | doesn't do anything about it. The guest is entered with PIR.ON, but the
> | posted interrupt IPI has not been sent and the interrupt is only delivered
> | to the guest on the next vmentry (if any).
>
> However the race has already been fixed by the side-effects of moving the
> RVI update after IN_GUEST_MODE in the commit:
>
> - The IPI for posted interrupts is issued after setting vcpu->mode =
> IN_GUEST_MODE and disabling interrupts, the posted interrupt IPI is
> delayed until the guest enters non-root mode; it is then trapped by
> the processor causing the interrupt to be injected.
> - The IPI for posted interrupts is issued between setting vcpu->mode =
> IN_GUEST_MODE and disabling interrupts, the movement of the RVI update
> after IN_GUEST_MODE in the commit will catch the new PIR, and set RVI.
>
> This patch tries to reduce the local IRQ disable time by restoring the
> place of disable local IRQ in order to improve host kernel responsibility
> to some degree.
This should not make any difference; we're talking of a few dozen clock
cycles, and it's quite possible that the extra chance of getting a PI
interrupt in the host negates it.
Paolo
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 1faf620..9d97041 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -6857,12 +6857,6 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvm_x86_ops->prepare_guest_switch(vcpu);
> kvm_load_guest_fpu(vcpu);
>
> - /*
> - * Disable IRQs before setting IN_GUEST_MODE. Posted interrupt
> - * IPI are then delayed after guest entry, which ensures that they
> - * result in virtual interrupt delivery.
> - */
> - local_irq_disable();
> vcpu->mode = IN_GUEST_MODE;
>
> srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> @@ -6881,6 +6875,8 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> */
> smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock();
>
> + local_irq_disable();
> +
> /*
> * This handles the case where a posted interrupt was
> * notified with kvm_vcpu_kick.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists