[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1489064578-17305-4-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 21:02:58 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Yi Zhang <yizhan@...hat.com>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: start to freeze queue just after setting dying
Before commit 780db2071a(blk-mq: decouble blk-mq freezing
from generic bypassing), the dying flag is checked before
entering queue, and Tejun converts the checking into .mq_freeze_depth,
and assumes the counter is increased just after dying flag
is set. Unfortunately we doesn't do that in blk_set_queue_dying().
This patch calls blk_mq_freeze_queue_start() for blk-mq in
blk_set_queue_dying(), so that we can block new I/O coming
once the queue is set as dying.
Given blk_set_queue_dying() is always called in remove path
of block device, and queue will be cleaned up later, we don't
need to worry about undo of the counter.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 0eeb99ef654f..559487e58296 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -500,9 +500,12 @@ void blk_set_queue_dying(struct request_queue *q)
queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DYING, q);
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- if (q->mq_ops)
+ if (q->mq_ops) {
blk_mq_wake_waiters(q);
- else {
+
+ /* block new I/O coming */
+ blk_mq_freeze_queue_start(q);
+ } else {
struct request_list *rl;
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists