[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170309151255.GA3343@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:12:55 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: RCU used on incoming CPU before rcu_cpu_starting() called
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > [ 30.694013] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
> > [ 30.694013] get_work_pool+0x82/0x90
> > [ 30.694013] __queue_work+0x70/0x5f0
> > [ 30.694013] queue_work_on+0x33/0x70
> > [ 30.694013] clear_sched_clock_stable+0x33/0x40
> > [ 30.694013] early_init_intel+0xe7/0x2f0
> > [ 30.694013] init_intel+0x11/0x350
> > [ 30.694013] identify_cpu+0x344/0x5a0
> > [ 30.694013] identify_secondary_cpu+0x18/0x80
> > [ 30.694013] smp_store_cpu_info+0x39/0x40
> > [ 30.694013] start_secondary+0x4e/0x100
> > [ 30.694013] start_cpu+0x14/0x14
> >
> > Here is the relevant code from x86's smp_callin():
> >
> > /*
> > * Save our processor parameters. Note: this information
> > * is needed for clock calibration.
> > */
> > smp_store_cpu_info(cpuid);
> >
> > The problem is that smp_store_cpu_info() indirectly invokes
> > schedule_work(), which wants to use RCU. But RCU isn't informed
> > of the incoming CPU until the call to notify_cpu_starting(), which
> > causes lockdep to complain bitterly about the use of RCU by the
> > premature call to schedule_work().
>
> Right. And that want's to be fixed, not hacked around by silencing RCU.
>
> Peter????
I'm thinking this is hotplug? 30 seconds after boot is far too late for
SMP bringup, or you have a stupid slow machine.
Because it only calls schedule_work() after SMP-init. In which case
there's then two cases, either:
- TSC was stable, hotplug wrecked it, TSC is now unstable, and we're
screwed.
- TSC was unstable, hotplug triggers and we want to mark it unstable
_again_.
If this is the second, the below should fix it, if its the first, I've
no idea yet on how to fix that properly :/
Bloody hotplug..
---
kernel/sched/clock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
index a08795e..eecf388 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void clear_sched_clock_stable(void)
smp_mb(); /* matches sched_clock_init_late() */
- if (sched_clock_running == 2)
+ if (sched_clock_running == 2 && sched_clock_stable())
schedule_work(&sched_clock_work);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists