lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:30:17 -0500
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>, jgross@...e.com,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] xen/9pfs: introduce Xen 9pfs transport driver

On 03/08/2017 06:58 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Introduce the Xen 9pfs transport driver: add struct xenbus_driver to
> register as a xenbus driver and add struct p9_trans_module to register
> as v9fs driver.
>
> All functions are empty stubs for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
> CC: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
> CC: jgross@...e.com
> CC: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
> CC: Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>
> CC: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>
> CC: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
> ---
>  net/9p/trans_xen.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 101 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 net/9p/trans_xen.c
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/trans_xen.c b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..877dfd0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/fs/9p/trans_xen
> + *
> + * Xen transport layer.

Does this need full copyright header?

Either way

Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>



Powered by blists - more mailing lists