[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4411b58e928a3c2cf0375342051a31d71190eb5.1489015238.git.julia@ni.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:21:55 -0600
From: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/19] gpio: etraxfs: make use of raw_spinlock variants
The etraxfs gpio driver currently implements an irq_chip for handling
interrupts; due to how irq_chip handling is done, it's necessary for the
irq_chip methods to be invoked from hardirq context, even on a a
real-time kernel. Because the spinlock_t type becomes a "sleeping"
spinlock w/ RT kernels, it is not suitable to be used with irq_chips.
A quick audit of the operations under the lock reveal that they do only
minimal, bounded work, and are therefore safe to do under a raw spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c
index a254d5b07b94..14c6aac26780 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
struct etraxfs_gpio_info;
struct etraxfs_gpio_block {
- spinlock_t lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
u32 mask;
u32 cfg;
u32 pins;
@@ -233,10 +233,10 @@ static void etraxfs_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
struct etraxfs_gpio_block *block = chip->block;
unsigned int grpirq = etraxfs_gpio_to_group_irq(d->hwirq);
- spin_lock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
block->mask &= ~BIT(grpirq);
writel(block->mask, block->regs + block->info->rw_intr_mask);
- spin_unlock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
}
static void etraxfs_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -246,10 +246,10 @@ static void etraxfs_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
struct etraxfs_gpio_block *block = chip->block;
unsigned int grpirq = etraxfs_gpio_to_group_irq(d->hwirq);
- spin_lock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
block->mask |= BIT(grpirq);
writel(block->mask, block->regs + block->info->rw_intr_mask);
- spin_unlock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
}
static int etraxfs_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
@@ -280,11 +280,11 @@ static int etraxfs_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
return -EINVAL;
}
- spin_lock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
block->cfg &= ~(0x7 << (grpirq * 3));
block->cfg |= (cfg << (grpirq * 3));
writel(block->cfg, block->regs + block->info->rw_intr_cfg);
- spin_unlock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources(struct irq_data *d)
unsigned int grpirq = etraxfs_gpio_to_group_irq(d->hwirq);
int ret = -EBUSY;
- spin_lock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
if (block->group[grpirq])
goto out;
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources(struct irq_data *d)
}
out:
- spin_unlock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -327,10 +327,10 @@ static void etraxfs_gpio_irq_release_resources(struct irq_data *d)
struct etraxfs_gpio_block *block = chip->block;
unsigned int grpirq = etraxfs_gpio_to_group_irq(d->hwirq);
- spin_lock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
block->group[grpirq] = 0;
gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(&chip->gc, d->hwirq);
- spin_unlock(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
}
static struct irq_chip etraxfs_gpio_irq_chip = {
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static int etraxfs_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!block)
return -ENOMEM;
- spin_lock_init(&block->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&block->lock);
block->regs = regs;
block->info = info;
--
2.11.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists