linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] base: soc: Let soc_device_match() return no match when called too early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1489083513-19245-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
Date:   Thu,  9 Mar 2017 19:18:32 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] base: soc: Let soc_device_match() return no match when called too early

If soc_device_match() is called before the SoC bus has been registered,
bus_for_each_dev() returns -EINVAL, which is considered a match, as it
is non-zero.

While calling soc_device_match() can be considered an integration
mistake, returning a match is counter-intuitive: soc_device_match() is
typically used to handle quirks, i.e. to deviate from the default path.
Hence add a check to abort checking and return no match instead.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
---
Should this use WARN_ONCE()?
---
 drivers/base/soc.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/soc.c b/drivers/base/soc.c
index dc26e5949a320223..50033081834a9ccd 100644
--- a/drivers/base/soc.c
+++ b/drivers/base/soc.c
@@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ const struct soc_device_attribute *soc_device_match(
 			break;
 		ret = bus_for_each_dev(&soc_bus_type, NULL, (void *)matches,
 				       soc_device_match_one);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return NULL;
 		if (!ret)
 			matches++;
 		else
-- 
2.7.4