linux-kernel - outreachy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703092133340.2306@hadrien>
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2017 21:36:50 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
cc:     swarren@...dotorg.org, lee@...nel.org, eric@...olt.net,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, rjui@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: outreachy

Hello,

I discussed the issue of outreachy patches for bcm with Greg, and we are
not convinced that not having the patches CCd to you is such a good idea.
While we don't want to spam you with noise, some of the applicants are
starting to make more significant changes that it could be useful for you
to be aware of.

Could we try a compromise where you are not CCd on whitespace patches, but
you are CCd on patches that actually modify the code?

thanks,
julia