linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: sysdev: cpm1: Optimise gpio bit calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <906c025b-47d0-f906-2613-291f350bd48d@c-s.fr>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:04:48 +0100
From:   Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: sysdev: cpm1: Optimise gpio bit calculation



Le 10/03/2017 à 14:06, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:54:19AM +0100, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>> gpio_get() and gpio_set() are used extensively by some GPIO based
>> drivers like SPI, NAND, so it may be worth it as it doesn't impair
>> readability (if anyone prefers, we could write  (1 << 31) >> i  instead
>> of  0x80000000 >> i )
>
> 1 << 31 is undefined behaviour, of course.
>

Shall it be 1U << 31 ?

Christophe