[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170310152131.GA20522@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:21:31 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 34/91] scsi: storvsc: use tagged SRB requests if
supported by the device
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:56:59PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 10:08 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > commit 3cd6d3d9b1abab8dcdf0800224ce26daac24eea2 upstream.
> >
> > Properly set SRB flags when hosting device supports tagged queuing.
> > This patch improves the performance on Fiber Channel disks.
> [...]
>
> This looks more like a feature/optimisation than a bug fix. Is this
> really within the stable rules?
Making things work properly (i.e. i/o does not suck anymore), is ok for
stable stuff. KY, that's the case here, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists