lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:04:36 -0800 (PST) From: Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>, vikas.shivappa@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, andi.kleen@...el.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86/intel_rdt: info file support for MBA prepare On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote: > >> As a preparatory patch to MBA info file setup, generalize the info file >> setup to have the option to choose between different set of files. >> Although multiple cache resources have same info files, Memory resources >> have different set of info files. That way we have the option to choose >> between memory resource and cache resource info files. > > Sigh. > >> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ struct rftype { >> * @default_ctrl: Specifies default cache cbm or mem b/w percent. >> * @min_cbm_bits: Minimum number of consecutive bits to be set >> * in a cache bit mask >> + * @info_files: resctrl info files for the resource >> + * @infofiles_len: Number of info files > > len == length, nr == number. No? Too intuitive, right? Took it as len as the rdtgroup_add_files calls its parameter as len.. Will fix to nr_infofiles as that seems better. > > And no, not infofiles_nr. It wants to be nr_infofiles. And while at it > please either use infofiles or info_files, but not a mixture of > both. Random underscores are not enhancing readability at all. > >> +void rdt_get_cache_infofile(struct rdt_resource *r) >> +{ >> + r->info_files = &res_cache_info_files[0]; > > What's wrong with > > r->info_files = res_cache_info_files; > > Nothing, but it would be too easy to read. This is not the obfuscated > c-code contest. Will fix.. Thanks, Vikas > >> + r->infofiles_len = ARRAY_SIZE(res_cache_info_files); > > Thanks, > > tglx >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists