linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] doc: bindings: Add bindings documentation for mtd nvmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26333808-3740-31ca-12ee-e4c6afc9ef29@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:28:47 +0100
From:   Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>, Alban <albeu@...e.fr>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] doc: bindings: Add bindings documentation for mtd
 nvmem

On 03/10/2017 07:38 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:52:36AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/10/2017 05:06 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On 03/07/2017 09:26 AM, Alban wrote:
>>>>> Config data for drivers, like MAC addresses, is often stored in MTD.
>>>>> Add a binding that define how such data storage can be represented in
>>>>> device tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alban <albeu@...e.fr>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>> v2: * Added a "Required properties" section with the nvmem-provider
>>>>>       property
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt        | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..8ed25e6
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
>>>>> += NVMEM in MTD =
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Config data for drivers, like MAC addresses, is often stored in MTD.
>>>>> +This binding define how such data storage can be represented in device tree.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +An MTD can be defined as an NVMEM provider by adding the `nvmem-provider`
>>>>> +property to their node. Data cells can then be defined as child nodes
>>>>> +of the partition as defined in nvmem.txt.
>>>>
>>>> Why don't we just read the data from MTD and be done with it ? What's
>>>> the benefit of complicating things by using nvmem ?
>>>
>>> Well because usually stuff like MAC addresses etc are stored in eeproms.
>>
>> But eeproms are already supported, see drivers/misc/ .
> 
> This the old, free for all, way to support eeproms. We have a proper
> framework for them now, and it's called nvmem.

Ha, so that's why this patchset, I see. Thanks for clarifying.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut