linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: Emulate UMIP (or almost do so)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:02:02 +0800
From:   Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     qian.ouyang@...el.com,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: Emulate UMIP (or almost do so)

On 3/1/2017 5:04 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/2016 7:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 13/12/2016 05:03, Li, Liang Z wrote:
>>> Hi Paolo,
>>>
>>> We intended to enable UMIP for KVM and found you had already worked 
>>> on it.
>>> Do you have any plan for the following patch set? It's there 
>>> anything else you expect
>>> us help to do?
>> Yes, I plan to resend these patches for 4.11.
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
>   Previously we saw your RFC patches of UMIP sent out, and we would 
> like to try some unit test in Intel. I found a patch written by you in 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9225929/, guess this is for the kvm 
> unit test(though I failed to git apply it directly).
>   And I wonder, when will it be integrated to kvm unit test repo?
>   Besides, is this all the test for UMIP unit test? I.e. do we need to 
> construct a scenario in the test to trigger vm exit and let hypervisor 
> inject a GP fault? - I did not see this scenario in this patch. Or any 
> other suggestions? :-)
>

Hi Paolo, any suggestions?
Sorry for the disturb. :)

Yu
> Thanks
> Yu
>