lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a88tle0y.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:41:33 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: sysdev: cpm1: Optimise gpio bit calculation

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr> writes:

> Help a bit the compiler to provide better code:
>
> unsigned int f(int i)
> {
> 	return 1 << (31 - i);
> }
>
> unsigned int g(int i)
> {
> 	return 0x80000000 >> i;
> }
>
> Disassembly of section .text:
>
> 00000000 <f>:
>    0:	20 63 00 1f 	subfic  r3,r3,31
>    4:	39 20 00 01 	li      r9,1
>    8:	7d 23 18 30 	slw     r3,r9,r3
>    c:	4e 80 00 20 	blr
>
> 00000010 <g>:
>   10:	3d 20 80 00 	lis     r9,-32768
>   14:	7d 23 1c 30 	srw     r3,r9,r3
>   18:	4e 80 00 20 	blr

Well yeah, it saves one instruction, but is it worth it? Are these gpio
routines in some hot path I don't know about?

cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ