lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:23:53 +0530
From:   Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
        Arve Hj�nnev�g <arve@...roid.com>,
        Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...gle.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linaro MM SIG <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@....com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/12] cma: Store a name in the cma structure

Hi Laura,

Thanks for the patch.

On 3 March 2017 at 03:14, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Frameworks that may want to enumerate CMA heaps (e.g. Ion) will find it
> useful to have an explicit name attached to each region. Store the name
> in each CMA structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c |  5 +++--
>  include/linux/cma.h           |  4 +++-
>  mm/cma.c                      | 11 +++++++++--
>  mm/cma.h                      |  1 +
>  mm/cma_debug.c                |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> +const char *cma_get_name(const struct cma *cma)
> +{
> +       return cma->name ? cma->name : "(undefined)";
> +}
> +
Would it make sense to perhaps have the idx stored as the name,
instead of 'undefined'? That would make sure that the various cma
names are still unique.

>  static unsigned long cma_bitmap_aligned_mask(const struct cma *cma,
>                                              int align_order)
>  {
> @@ -168,6 +173,7 @@ core_initcall(cma_init_reserved_areas);
>   */
>  int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
>                                  unsigned int order_per_bit,
> +                                const char *name,
>                                  struct cma **res_cma)
>  {

Best regards,
Sumit.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ