linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 091/153] arm64: dma-mapping: Fix dma_mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170310083952.465978262@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:08:44 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
        Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 091/153] arm64: dma-mapping: Fix dma_mapping_error() when bypassing SWIOTLB

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>

commit adbe7e26f4257f72817495b9bce114284060b0d7 upstream.

When bypassing SWIOTLB on small-memory systems, we need to avoid calling
into swiotlb_dma_mapping_error() in exactly the same way as we avoid
swiotlb_dma_supported(), because the former also relies on SWIOTLB state
being initialised.

Under the assumptions for which we skip SWIOTLB, dma_map_{single,page}()
will only ever return the DMA-offset-adjusted physical address of the
page passed in, thus we can report success unconditionally.

Fixes: b67a8b29df7e ("arm64: mm: only initialize swiotlb when necessary")
CC: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Reported-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -352,6 +352,13 @@ static int __swiotlb_dma_supported(struc
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int __swiotlb_dma_mapping_error(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t addr)
+{
+	if (swiotlb)
+		return swiotlb_dma_mapping_error(hwdev, addr);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
 	.alloc = __dma_alloc,
 	.free = __dma_free,
@@ -366,7 +373,7 @@ static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_op
 	.sync_sg_for_cpu = __swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu,
 	.sync_sg_for_device = __swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device,
 	.dma_supported = __swiotlb_dma_supported,
-	.mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
+	.mapping_error = __swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
 };
 
 static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)