| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20170310083956.534613416@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:09:46 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@...learcat.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 153/153] netfilter: conntrack: refine gc worker heuristics, redux
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
commit e5072053b09642b8ff417d47da05b84720aea3ee upstream.
This further refines the changes made to conntrack gc_worker in
commit e0df8cae6c16 ("netfilter: conntrack: refine gc worker heuristics").
The main idea of that change was to reduce the scan interval when evictions
take place.
However, on the reporters' setup, there are 1-2 million conntrack entries
in total and roughly 8k new (and closing) connections per second.
In this case we'll always evict at least one entry per gc cycle and scan
interval is always at 1 jiffy because of this test:
} else if (expired_count) {
gc_work->next_gc_run /= 2U;
next_run = msecs_to_jiffies(1);
being true almost all the time.
Given we scan ~10k entries per run its clearly wrong to reduce interval
based on nonzero eviction count, it will only waste cpu cycles since a vast
majorities of conntracks are not timed out.
Thus only look at the ratio (scanned entries vs. evicted entries) to make
a decision on whether to reduce or not.
Because evictor is supposed to only kick in when system turns idle after
a busy period, pick a high ratio -- this makes it 50%. We thus keep
the idea of increasing scan rate when its likely that table contains many
expired entries.
In order to not let timed-out entries hang around for too long
(important when using event logging, in which case we want to timely
destroy events), we now scan the full table within at most
GC_MAX_SCAN_JIFFIES (16 seconds) even in worst-case scenario where all
timed-out entries sit in same slot.
I tested this with a vm under synflood (with
sysctl net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_recv=3).
While flood is ongoing, interval now stays at its max rate
(GC_MAX_SCAN_JIFFIES / GC_MAX_BUCKETS_DIV -> 125ms).
With feedback from Nicolas Dichtel.
Reported-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@...learcat.com>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Fixes: b87a2f9199ea82eaadc ("netfilter: conntrack: add gc worker to remove timed-out entries")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Tested-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Tested-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@...learcat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -85,9 +85,11 @@ static __read_mostly DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_
static __read_mostly bool nf_conntrack_locks_all;
/* every gc cycle scans at most 1/GC_MAX_BUCKETS_DIV part of table */
-#define GC_MAX_BUCKETS_DIV 64u
-/* upper bound of scan intervals */
-#define GC_INTERVAL_MAX (2 * HZ)
+#define GC_MAX_BUCKETS_DIV 128u
+/* upper bound of full table scan */
+#define GC_MAX_SCAN_JIFFIES (16u * HZ)
+/* desired ratio of entries found to be expired */
+#define GC_EVICT_RATIO 50u
static struct conntrack_gc_work conntrack_gc_work;
@@ -936,6 +938,7 @@ static noinline int early_drop(struct ne
static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
{
+ unsigned int min_interval = max(HZ / GC_MAX_BUCKETS_DIV, 1u);
unsigned int i, goal, buckets = 0, expired_count = 0;
struct conntrack_gc_work *gc_work;
unsigned int ratio, scanned = 0;
@@ -994,27 +997,25 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct
* 1. Minimize time until we notice a stale entry
* 2. Maximize scan intervals to not waste cycles
*
- * Normally, expired_count will be 0, this increases the next_run time
- * to priorize 2) above.
+ * Normally, expire ratio will be close to 0.
*
- * As soon as a timed-out entry is found, move towards 1) and increase
- * the scan frequency.
- * In case we have lots of evictions next scan is done immediately.
+ * As soon as a sizeable fraction of the entries have expired
+ * increase scan frequency.
*/
ratio = scanned ? expired_count * 100 / scanned : 0;
- if (ratio >= 90) {
- gc_work->next_gc_run = 0;
- next_run = 0;
- } else if (expired_count) {
- gc_work->next_gc_run /= 2U;
- next_run = msecs_to_jiffies(1);
+ if (ratio > GC_EVICT_RATIO) {
+ gc_work->next_gc_run = min_interval;
} else {
- if (gc_work->next_gc_run < GC_INTERVAL_MAX)
- gc_work->next_gc_run += msecs_to_jiffies(1);
+ unsigned int max = GC_MAX_SCAN_JIFFIES / GC_MAX_BUCKETS_DIV;
- next_run = gc_work->next_gc_run;
+ BUILD_BUG_ON((GC_MAX_SCAN_JIFFIES / GC_MAX_BUCKETS_DIV) == 0);
+
+ gc_work->next_gc_run += min_interval;
+ if (gc_work->next_gc_run > max)
+ gc_work->next_gc_run = max;
}
+ next_run = gc_work->next_gc_run;
gc_work->last_bucket = i;
queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &gc_work->dwork, next_run);
}
@@ -1022,7 +1023,7 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct
static void conntrack_gc_work_init(struct conntrack_gc_work *gc_work)
{
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&gc_work->dwork, gc_worker);
- gc_work->next_gc_run = GC_INTERVAL_MAX;
+ gc_work->next_gc_run = HZ;
gc_work->exiting = false;
}
@@ -1915,7 +1916,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_init_start(void)
nf_ct_untracked_status_or(IPS_CONFIRMED | IPS_UNTRACKED);
conntrack_gc_work_init(&conntrack_gc_work);
- queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &conntrack_gc_work.dwork, GC_INTERVAL_MAX);
+ queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &conntrack_gc_work.dwork, HZ);
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists