| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20170310083959.624353169@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:08:03 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 040/167] tpm_tis: use default timeout value if chip reports it as zero
4.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
commit 1d70fe9d9c3a4c627f9757cbba5d628687b121c1 upstream.
Since commit 1107d065fdf1 ("tpm_tis: Introduce intermediate layer for
TPM access") Atmel 3203 TPM on ThinkPad X61S (TPM firmware version 13.9)
no longer works. The initialization proceeds fine until we get and
start using chip-reported timeouts - and the chip reports C and D
timeouts of zero.
It turns out that until commit 8e54caf407b98e ("tpm: Provide a generic
means to override the chip returned timeouts") we had actually let
default timeout values remain in this case, so let's bring back this
behavior to make chips like Atmel 3203 work again.
Use a common code that was introduced by that commit so a warning is
printed in this case and /sys/class/tpm/tpm*/timeouts correctly says the
timeouts aren't chip-original.
Fixes: 1107d065fdf1 ("tpm_tis: Introduce intermediate layer for TPM access")
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 2 -
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 6 ++--
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 2 -
4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
@@ -499,8 +499,7 @@ static int tpm_startup(struct tpm_chip *
int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
{
cap_t cap;
- unsigned long new_timeout[4];
- unsigned long old_timeout[4];
+ unsigned long timeout_old[4], timeout_chip[4], timeout_eff[4];
ssize_t rc;
if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS)
@@ -538,11 +537,15 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *ch
if (rc)
return rc;
- old_timeout[0] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.a);
- old_timeout[1] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.b);
- old_timeout[2] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.c);
- old_timeout[3] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.d);
- memcpy(new_timeout, old_timeout, sizeof(new_timeout));
+ timeout_old[0] = jiffies_to_usecs(chip->timeout_a);
+ timeout_old[1] = jiffies_to_usecs(chip->timeout_b);
+ timeout_old[2] = jiffies_to_usecs(chip->timeout_c);
+ timeout_old[3] = jiffies_to_usecs(chip->timeout_d);
+ timeout_chip[0] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.a);
+ timeout_chip[1] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.b);
+ timeout_chip[2] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.c);
+ timeout_chip[3] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.d);
+ memcpy(timeout_eff, timeout_chip, sizeof(timeout_eff));
/*
* Provide ability for vendor overrides of timeout values in case
@@ -550,16 +553,24 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *ch
*/
if (chip->ops->update_timeouts != NULL)
chip->timeout_adjusted =
- chip->ops->update_timeouts(chip, new_timeout);
+ chip->ops->update_timeouts(chip, timeout_eff);
if (!chip->timeout_adjusted) {
- /* Don't overwrite default if value is 0 */
- if (new_timeout[0] != 0 && new_timeout[0] < 1000) {
- int i;
+ /* Restore default if chip reported 0 */
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(timeout_eff); i++) {
+ if (timeout_eff[i])
+ continue;
+
+ timeout_eff[i] = timeout_old[i];
+ chip->timeout_adjusted = true;
+ }
+
+ if (timeout_eff[0] != 0 && timeout_eff[0] < 1000) {
/* timeouts in msec rather usec */
- for (i = 0; i != ARRAY_SIZE(new_timeout); i++)
- new_timeout[i] *= 1000;
+ for (i = 0; i != ARRAY_SIZE(timeout_eff); i++)
+ timeout_eff[i] *= 1000;
chip->timeout_adjusted = true;
}
}
@@ -568,16 +579,16 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *ch
if (chip->timeout_adjusted) {
dev_info(&chip->dev,
HW_ERR "Adjusting reported timeouts: A %lu->%luus B %lu->%luus C %lu->%luus D %lu->%luus\n",
- old_timeout[0], new_timeout[0],
- old_timeout[1], new_timeout[1],
- old_timeout[2], new_timeout[2],
- old_timeout[3], new_timeout[3]);
+ timeout_chip[0], timeout_eff[0],
+ timeout_chip[1], timeout_eff[1],
+ timeout_chip[2], timeout_eff[2],
+ timeout_chip[3], timeout_eff[3]);
}
- chip->timeout_a = usecs_to_jiffies(new_timeout[0]);
- chip->timeout_b = usecs_to_jiffies(new_timeout[1]);
- chip->timeout_c = usecs_to_jiffies(new_timeout[2]);
- chip->timeout_d = usecs_to_jiffies(new_timeout[3]);
+ chip->timeout_a = usecs_to_jiffies(timeout_eff[0]);
+ chip->timeout_b = usecs_to_jiffies(timeout_eff[1]);
+ chip->timeout_c = usecs_to_jiffies(timeout_eff[2]);
+ chip->timeout_d = usecs_to_jiffies(timeout_eff[3]);
rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_DURATION, &cap,
"attempting to determine the durations");
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *d
irq = tpm_info->irq;
if (itpm)
- phy->priv.flags |= TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE;
+ phy->priv.flags |= TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND;
return tpm_tis_core_init(dev, &phy->priv, irq, &tpm_tcg,
acpi_dev_handle);
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_
struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
int rc, status, burstcnt;
size_t count = 0;
- bool itpm = priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE;
+ bool itpm = priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND;
if (request_locality(chip, 0) < 0)
return -EBUSY;
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev
(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) ? "2.0" : "1.2",
vendor >> 16, rid);
- if (!(priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE)) {
+ if (!(priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND)) {
probe = probe_itpm(chip);
if (probe < 0) {
rc = -ENODEV;
@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev
}
if (!!probe)
- priv->flags |= TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE;
+ priv->flags |= TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND;
}
/* Figure out the capabilities */
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ enum tis_defaults {
#define TPM_RID(l) (0x0F04 | ((l) << 12))
enum tpm_tis_flags {
- TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE = BIT(0),
+ TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND = BIT(0),
};
struct tpm_tis_data {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists